8

In the Marigold presentation it is stated that

But first, project resources are dedicated to a new smart contract language for Tezos. What currently exists was sufficient for the Marigold prototype. However, the contracts needed for the full feature set described above require more because of their additional complexity.

Is there an other document or site I should read or follow to learn more about these features that would not be present in Michelson or Liquidity?

Improve this question
4
  • 1
    Whatever they will need that is not in Michelson (and Liquidity that has an equivalent expressivity), they will need a protocol amendment to get it. Maybe they are just looking for a better syntax, like the ReasonML syntax now available on Liquidity.
    – lefessan
    Feb 23, 2019 at 15:41
  • 1
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it requires specific details about a 3rd parties intentions/opinions and doesn't relate specifically to Tezos
    – Stephen Andrews
    Mar 5, 2019 at 4:58
  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it relates to a commercial argument: it's unclear whether the authors of the original paper know themselves the reply to this question.
    – lefessan
    Mar 5, 2019 at 7:31
  • I edited to improve admissibility of the question.
    – Clement J.
    Mar 15, 2019 at 19:25

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
3

You may want to follow this project: https://medium.com/tezos/introducing-ligo-a-new-smart-contract-language-for-tezos-233fa17f21c7

Not many answers for now, syntax apart, it looks like Liquidity or Fi.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.