1

I have been contemplating replacing off-chain views entirely with on-chain views in my contracts since the former leads to unnecessary work of having an otherwise redundant metadata big-map with a Michelson storage view. However, my only concern is large views bumping up the gas consumption on calling normal entrypoints.

I see an issue on Gitlab (https://gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/-/issues/2237) but related MRs in the comments don't seem to have been merged.

PS: I have not considered the extra one-time origination cost due to the increase in the size of the contract file to be deployed.

1 Answer 1

3

Yes, I think that currently, all the code and views are type-checked.

A workaround is to declare views are global constants. But there is no support for this in high-level SC languages for the moment I think.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.