1

I've had an idea about being able to utilize effectively random #s on tezos, but I don't know if it's totally stupid and impossible to utilize, or a possible and really simple solution:

I need to preface this with the fact that I am more monkey than coder, but I do have some experience with visual coding and have read some books on C.

Would it be possible to have a smart contract that when invoked, adds 1 (or what-have-you) to the chaotic subset of the mandelbrot set zn+1 = zn2 + c (or any formula with a chaotic subsection of results) and returns the result to the sender?

You could have a second contract that runs on its own (utilizing the same mandelbrot set formula, except running each block possibly?) to invoke the first RNG contract with a pseudorandom #.

You'd have a "pseudo-randomized" contract invoking another "pseudo-randomized" contract that can also be invoked by anyone looking to gain a new random number from it. It seems like if you have enough "pseudo-randomness" layers mixed with decentralized behaviors, then it starts to become ridiculous for bad actors to manipulate or predict the output.

Maybe the math could be done in a way where you could do this for multiple contracts that anyone could invoke to do get specific ranges of randomized numbers. 1-10, 1-100, 1-1000, etc.

I don't know how to logistically create or test this, but from what I'm researching, utilizing quality randomness seems to be a difficulty on-chain. In my mind, using contracts removes the need for an oracle, but I could be totally off. Maybe there's something here to spark an idea in one of your more code-experienced brain machines!

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.